{
 "dataset": "claim-reviews",
 "version": "1.4.0",
 "generated_on": "2026-11-06",
 "licence": "CC BY 4.0 for ComputeFinder-owned summaries, labels and compilation rights only, except where a record supplies a specific adaptation licence. Third-party material retains its source terms.",
 "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
 "licence_scope": "Only copyright and database rights controlled by ComputeFinder in its original contributions. No third-party rights are granted. Source reuse terms have not been comprehensively cleared; consult each linked source. Private submissions, contact details, code and branding are excluded.",
 "source_terms_status": "Not comprehensively cleared; check linked sources before reusing third-party material.",
 "attribution": "Compiled by ComputeFinder (https://computefinder.net). Original contributions licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), except adaptations carrying a record-specific licence. Give appropriate credit, retain licence and source notices, and indicate changes when sharing. Each record links its primary source; retain any attribution required by that source. Material is provided as-is without warranties.",
 "note": "ComputeFinder-owned original contributions only; cited sources retain their own rights and notices. No source licence or check is inferred from an empty register. Supporting/counter-evidence arrays may be empty, meaning no evidence recorded, not none exists. No prices are included. Missing values are null or absent, never zero.",
 "records": [
  {
   "slug": "closed-loop-label-water-boundaries",
   "claim": "DOE/FEMP describes a direct liquid-cooling arrangement in which a closed internal water loop passes heat onward to a cooling tower.",
   "attribution": "U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program technical guidance; independently worded account of the cited section.",
   "claim_date": "Original publication date not established in the inspected HTML. The date displayed beneath an illustration is not assigned to this claim.",
   "scope": "Whether a cooling-system label alone settles a water conclusion. This is not a verdict on Cambois, another project, measured water use or a particular cooling design.",
   "original_evidence": [
    {
     "label": "DOE/FEMP: Direct Liquid Cooling Systems section",
     "url": "https://www.energy.gov/cmei/femp/cooling-water-efficiency-opportunities-federal-data-centers",
     "research_slug": "doe-femp-cooling-water-guidance",
     "source_notice": "Source copyright and any applicable third-party rights are retained. Minimal independently worded attributed facts and ordinary unframed links only. No copied passages, figures, tables, model inputs, images, databases or broad source-use grant; no endorsement. No open licence is asserted unless separately identified for the exact component."
    }
   ],
   "supporting_evidence": [],
   "counter_evidence": [],
   "method_differences": "Separate internal heat transfer from final heat rejection, site water from electricity-related water, and annual energy from peak electrical demand.",
   "finding": "supported within stated bounds",
   "reason": "The technical text describes this arrangement as one variant. It supports that limited description, not zero site water or an observed whole-site footprint. The source alone does not quantify indirect water, net savings, electricity peaks or a universal trade-off.",
   "unresolved_questions": "The actual heat-rejection design, climate, operating data, electricity source and timing remain needed for a named site. No peak-load, litres-per-task or total-water conclusion is admitted.",
   "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
   "dossier_publication": {
    "slug": "closed-loop-label-water-boundaries",
    "title": "Closed loops and cooling-water boundaries",
    "publisher": "ComputeFinder",
    "original_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/closed-loop-label-water-boundaries",
    "publication_date": null,
    "data_period": "Selected engineering guidance; no measured site period or common water/electricity comparison window is established.",
    "scope": "Whether a cooling-system label alone settles a water conclusion. This is not a verdict on Cambois, another project, measured water use or a particular cooling design.",
    "method": "Bounded editorial review of the recorded original, supporting and counter-evidence citations, with separate measurement definitions, a scoped finding and unresolved questions. This is not a systematic evidence review or an empirical site study.",
    "evidence_type": "editorial_review",
    "assumptions": "The described cooling arrangement is a system variant. Internal heat transfer, final heat rejection, site water, electricity-related water and peak electrical load require separate boundaries.",
    "uncertainty": "A bounded engineering description is not an empirical comparison of every cooling design. No additional supporting or contrary source is recorded for this exact assertion. The dossier’s editorial publication date and dossier-specific funding/interests declaration are not recorded. Null interests do not mean that none exist. checked_on repeats the retained scoped claim-evidence check; it is not a new editorial metadata or source check.",
    "funding_interests": null,
    "reuse_terms": "CC BY 4.0 applies only to ComputeFinder-owned original dossier wording and compilation rights. Cited third-party sources retain their own exact notices, attribution, reuse terms and exclusions; no source licence or endorsement is inherited.",
    "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
    "related_question": "Does an internal closed-loop label determine a data centre’s water consumption or electrical demand?",
    "cannot_establish": "The actual heat-rejection design, climate, operating data, electricity source and timing remain needed for a named site. No peak-load, litres-per-task or total-water conclusion is admitted."
   },
   "reuse_terms": null,
   "licence_url": null,
   "source_notice": "Source copyright and any applicable third-party rights are retained. Minimal independently worded attributed facts and ordinary unframed links only. No copied passages, figures, tables, model inputs, images, databases or broad source-use grant; no endorsement. No open licence is asserted unless separately identified for the exact component.",
   "uncertainty": "A bounded engineering description is not an empirical comparison of every cooling design. No additional supporting or contrary source is recorded for this exact assertion.",
   "page_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/closed-loop-label-water-boundaries"
  },
  {
   "slug": "job-years-fte-and-headcount",
   "claim": "UKEF explains that its estimated supported jobs are full-time equivalents rather than headcount, and that support across periods can be expressed as job-years.",
   "attribution": "UK Export Finance, Economic impacts of our support 2024 to 2025, sections 5 and 6.2; independently worded methodological account.",
   "claim_date": "17 July 2025, the displayed publication date; this is not a data-centre hiring event.",
   "scope": "The report’s employment-measurement definitions only. No UKEF model outcome, multiplier, forecast or employment result is transferred to a data centre or local planning application.",
   "original_evidence": [
    {
     "label": "UKEF report: limitations and full-time-equivalent definition",
     "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-export-finance-economic-impacts-of-our-support-2024-to-2025/uk-export-finance-economic-impacts-of-our-support-2024-to-2025",
     "research_slug": "ukef-employment-measurement-2024-2025",
     "source_notice": "Crown copyright 2025, UK Export Finance. The government publication expressly states OGL v3.0 except identified third-party material. Minimal original attributed methodological facts and ordinary links only; no numerical results, worked examples, figures, tables, model inputs or third-party content copied. No endorsement or data-centre employment inference."
    }
   ],
   "supporting_evidence": [
    {
     "label": "Separate additionality context, not verification of UKEF results: MHCLG employment guidance 6.22-6.25",
     "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-mhclg-appraisal-guide/the-mhclg-appraisal-guide",
     "research_slug": "mhclg-employment-appraisal-guidance",
     "source_notice": "Crown copyright 2026, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. The HTML publication expressly states OGL v3.0 except identified third-party content. Original brief account of employment-method guidance only; no illustrations, model tables or third-party content. No endorsement."
    }
   ],
   "counter_evidence": [],
   "method_differences": "FTEs standardise working hours, headcount counts people and job-years aggregate employment across periods. Local additional employment also needs its own counterfactual and population. These measures cannot be silently substituted for one another.",
   "finding": "supported within stated bounds",
   "reason": "The original method distinguishes hour-standardised employment from people and period aggregates. This supports reading the units separately; it does not demonstrate realised hiring or provide a permanent-post conversion for a construction total.",
   "unresolved_questions": "A named data-centre planning case still needs independently reviewed construction periods, direct and indirect roles, operational staffing and local additionality assumptions. No project forecast or multiplier is admitted.",
   "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
   "dossier_publication": {
    "slug": "job-years-fte-and-headcount",
    "title": "Job-years, headcount and local employment claims",
    "publisher": "ComputeFinder",
    "original_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/job-years-fte-and-headcount",
    "publication_date": null,
    "data_period": "Selected employment-measurement methods; no construction or permanent data-centre staffing period is admitted.",
    "scope": "The report’s employment-measurement definitions only. No UKEF model outcome, multiplier, forecast or employment result is transferred to a data centre or local planning application.",
    "method": "Bounded editorial review of the recorded original, supporting and counter-evidence citations, with separate measurement definitions, a scoped finding and unresolved questions. This is not a systematic evidence review or an empirical site study.",
    "evidence_type": "editorial_review",
    "assumptions": "Headcount, full-time equivalents, job-years, direct and indirect employment and local additionality remain distinct measures.",
    "uncertainty": "This dossier establishes a measurement distinction, not actual data-centre employment. The separate construction-versus-permanent planning case remains unfinished. The dossier’s editorial publication date and dossier-specific funding/interests declaration are not recorded. Null interests do not mean that none exist. checked_on repeats the retained scoped claim-evidence check; it is not a new editorial metadata or source check.",
    "funding_interests": null,
    "reuse_terms": "CC BY 4.0 applies only to ComputeFinder-owned original dossier wording and compilation rights. Cited third-party sources retain their own exact notices, attribution, reuse terms and exclusions; no source licence or endorsement is inherited.",
    "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
    "related_question": "What can a job-year or full-time-equivalent estimate establish about permanent local data-centre jobs?",
    "cannot_establish": "A named data-centre planning case still needs independently reviewed construction periods, direct and indirect roles, operational staffing and local additionality assumptions. No project forecast or multiplier is admitted."
   },
   "reuse_terms": "Minimal attributed original account of the selected Crown government methodology under the publication’s express OGL v3.0 notice, with source/licence links and third-party exclusions.",
   "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
   "source_notice": "Crown copyright 2025, UK Export Finance. The government publication expressly states OGL v3.0 except identified third-party material. Minimal original attributed methodological facts and ordinary links only; no numerical results, worked examples, figures, tables, model inputs or third-party content copied. No endorsement or data-centre employment inference.",
   "funding_interests": "UKEF is the government issuer reporting on its own support. This provenance does not independently validate its model. MHCLG is a separate government appraisal-guidance issuer.",
   "uncertainty": "This dossier establishes a measurement distinction, not actual data-centre employment. The separate construction-versus-permanent planning case remains unfinished.",
   "page_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/job-years-fte-and-headcount"
  },
  {
   "slug": "annual-matching-hourly-local-power",
   "claim": "EPA distinguishes annual-volume electricity matching from hourly matching that normally considers the same region as consumption.",
   "attribution": "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity; independently worded account of its explanatory definitions.",
   "claim_date": "Original publication date not established. The page states last updated 12 December 2025; that update is not treated as a new procurement event.",
   "scope": "What annual-volume matching alone establishes compared with hourly and regional matching. This is not an emissions audit or assessment of any named PPA, grid or project.",
   "original_evidence": [
    {
     "label": "EPA: annual-volume and hourly/regional definitions",
     "url": "https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/247-hourly-matching-electricity",
     "research_slug": "epa-hourly-electricity-matching-guidance",
     "source_notice": "Source copyright and any applicable third-party rights are retained. Minimal independently worded attributed facts and ordinary unframed links only. No copied passages, figures, tables, model inputs, images, databases or broad source-use grant; no endorsement. No open licence is asserted unless separately identified for the exact component."
    }
   ],
   "supporting_evidence": [],
   "counter_evidence": [],
   "method_differences": "Annual volume, hourly timing, procurement location, actual grid supply, location-based carbon intensity and congestion each need their own evidence.",
   "finding": "supported within stated bounds",
   "reason": "The inspected definitions support this distinction. They do not establish a named buyer’s hourly matching, local carbon intensity, actual power delivery or congestion outcome.",
   "unresolved_questions": "A named case still needs load and generation timestamps, certificate/contract boundaries, geography and relevant grid evidence. No congestion, additionality or zero-emissions outcome is inferred.",
   "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
   "dossier_publication": {
    "slug": "annual-matching-hourly-local-power",
    "title": "Annual matching and hourly local electricity",
    "publisher": "ComputeFinder",
    "original_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/annual-matching-hourly-local-power",
    "publication_date": null,
    "data_period": "Selected procurement definitions; no measured hourly electricity, emissions or transmission-congestion period is admitted.",
    "scope": "What annual-volume matching alone establishes compared with hourly and regional matching. This is not an emissions audit or assessment of any named PPA, grid or project.",
    "method": "Bounded editorial review of the recorded original, supporting and counter-evidence citations, with separate measurement definitions, a scoped finding and unresolved questions. This is not a systematic evidence review or an empirical site study.",
    "evidence_type": "editorial_review",
    "assumptions": "Annual volume, hourly timing, location, physical grid supply and grid effects require separate evidence.",
    "uncertainty": "The source is an explanatory EPA page, not measured hourly data. Its displayed update date is 12 December 2025; market conditions are not freshly generalised. The dossier’s editorial publication date and dossier-specific funding/interests declaration are not recorded. Null interests do not mean that none exist. checked_on repeats the retained scoped claim-evidence check; it is not a new editorial metadata or source check.",
    "funding_interests": null,
    "reuse_terms": "CC BY 4.0 applies only to ComputeFinder-owned original dossier wording and compilation rights. Cited third-party sources retain their own exact notices, attribution, reuse terms and exclusions; no source licence or endorsement is inherited.",
    "checked_on": "2026-10-31",
    "related_question": "What does annual renewable-electricity matching establish about hourly local power and grid effects?",
    "cannot_establish": "A named case still needs load and generation timestamps, certificate/contract boundaries, geography and relevant grid evidence. No congestion, additionality or zero-emissions outcome is inferred."
   },
   "reuse_terms": null,
   "licence_url": null,
   "source_notice": "Source copyright and any applicable third-party rights are retained. Minimal independently worded attributed facts and ordinary unframed links only. No copied passages, figures, tables, model inputs, images, databases or broad source-use grant; no endorsement. No open licence is asserted unless separately identified for the exact component.",
   "uncertainty": "The source is an explanatory EPA page, not measured hourly data. Its displayed update date is 12 December 2025; market conditions are not freshly generalised.",
   "page_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/annual-matching-hourly-local-power"
  },
  {
   "slug": "swe04-langsele-heat-development",
   "claim": "Company accounts describe a SWE04/Långsele development agreement and commercial negotiations; these sources do not establish delivered heat.",
   "attribution": "atNorth and Calentix report their own project-development arrangements. The atNorth blog is a joint party account; Calentix describes its own project, not independent corroboration.",
   "claim_date": "Publication and agreement-signature dates are not established. November 2026 is the period stated by Calentix for its project position, not an invented event day.",
   "scope": "The proposed first-phase district-heating connection associated with atNorth SWE04 and Långsele in Sollefteå municipality. Other atNorth sites and a possible later Sollefteå network phase are separate.",
   "original_evidence": [
    {
     "label": "Calentix: atNorth SWE04/Långsele project account, November 2026 position",
     "url": "https://calentix.com/en/projects/atnorth-swe04-langsele",
     "source_notice": "Minimal independently worded party-attributed facts and ordinary unframed original links only. Source copyright remains with its owners; no open source-content licence, copied text, imagery, chart, pipeline/database import or recurring acquisition grant. Publication, update, agreement-signature, retrieval and immutable-version metadata remain unestablished. The inspected accounts are party statements, not independent engineering or delivered-benefit verification."
    },
    {
     "label": "atNorth and Calentix: why heat reuse starts with planning",
     "url": "https://www.atnorth.com/blog/why-heat-reuse-starts-with-planning/",
     "source_notice": "Minimal independently worded party-attributed facts and ordinary unframed original links only. Source copyright remains with its owners; no open source-content licence, copied text, imagery, chart, pipeline/database import or recurring acquisition grant. Publication, update, agreement-signature, retrieval and immutable-version metadata remain unestablished. The inspected accounts are party statements, not independent engineering or delivered-benefit verification."
    },
    {
     "label": "Calentix projects: named SWE04/Långsele listing",
     "url": "https://calentix.com/en/projects",
     "source_notice": "Minimal independently worded party-attributed facts and ordinary unframed original links only. Source copyright remains with its owners; no open source-content licence, copied text, imagery, chart, pipeline/database import or recurring acquisition grant. Publication, update, agreement-signature, retrieval and immutable-version metadata remain unestablished. The inspected accounts are party statements, not independent engineering or delivered-benefit verification."
    }
   ],
   "supporting_evidence": [],
   "counter_evidence": [],
   "method_differences": "A Project Development Agreement concerns development work, not a Heat Purchase Agreement or investment decision. Feasibility, commercial negotiations, finance and actual heat delivery are distinct. No quantities, capacity totals or modelled benefits are combined.",
   "finding": "supported within stated bounds",
   "reason": "The parties report a development agreement. Calentix labels the named project commercial negotiations in November 2026, with heat price, land access, grid terms and co-funding still under negotiation. Calentix leads project development; atNorth would provide heat access and site interfaces. These inspected accounts do not demonstrate a completed heat-purchase agreement, investment/financing decision or heat delivery.",
   "unresolved_questions": "Look for separately usable evidence of the exact first-phase heat-purchase agreement, investment and financing decisions, and ultimately commissioned or delivered heat. The responsible project parties are Calentix and atNorth within their stated roles. Any later Sollefteå network connection is a distinct possible phase. No verified next-decision day or delivered local consequence is supplied here.",
   "checked_on": "2026-11-06",
   "dossier_publication": {
    "slug": "swe04-langsele-heat-development",
    "title": "SWE04 and Långsele: development agreement and negotiations",
    "publisher": "ComputeFinder",
    "original_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/swe04-langsele-heat-development",
    "publication_date": null,
    "data_period": "The Calentix project account labels its position November 2026. This is a source-described period, not a publication day, agreement-signature day or observed heat-delivery date.",
    "scope": "The proposed first-phase district-heating connection associated with atNorth SWE04 and Långsele in Sollefteå municipality. Other atNorth sites and a possible later Sollefteå network phase are separate.",
    "method": "Bounded original-wording review of named company accounts and their precise source-use conditions. Distinguish project-development and negotiation statements from purchase agreements, investment decisions, financing and delivered heat.",
    "evidence_type": "editorial_review",
    "assumptions": "Statements by atNorth and Calentix describe their own project. A joint account is not two independent corroborators. No physical-heat measurement or benefit calculation is imported.",
    "uncertainty": "Publication, update, signature, retrieval and immutable-source-version metadata are not established. This source-scoped review cannot establish whether later events occurred. The editorial publication date and dossier-specific funding/interests declaration remain unrecorded; null interests do not mean none exist.",
    "funding_interests": null,
    "reuse_terms": "CC BY 4.0 applies only to ComputeFinder-owned original dossier wording and compilation rights. Cited sources retain their own rights and precise use conditions; no source licence or endorsement is inherited.",
    "checked_on": "2026-11-06",
    "related_question": "What has the SWE04/Långsele heat project reached, and which evidence would distinguish negotiations from delivered local heat?",
    "cannot_establish": "A signed Heat Purchase Agreement, final investment decision, secured financing, construction, heat delivery, measured environmental benefit, current data-centre capacity or available compute. Unknown is not proof that an event never occurred."
   },
   "reuse_terms": null,
   "licence_url": null,
   "source_notice": "Minimal independently worded party-attributed facts and ordinary unframed original links only. Source copyright remains with its owners; no open source-content licence, copied text, imagery, chart, pipeline/database import or recurring acquisition grant. Publication, update, agreement-signature, retrieval and immutable-version metadata remain unestablished. The inspected accounts are party statements, not independent engineering or delivered-benefit verification.",
   "uncertainty": "The original publication and agreement-signature dates are unknown. The November 2026 project period does not date every underlying event. No independent technical, network-operator or delivered-benefit confirmation is recorded; an empty counter-evidence list means none is recorded, not that none exists.",
   "page_url": "https://computefinder.net/research/claims/swe04-langsele-heat-development"
  }
 ]
}